AI-augmented defence, tested by real attackers.

A penetration test has a fixed scope and timeframe. The goal is to find and document as many vulnerabilities as possible inside that boundary. A red team engagement is broader and goal-driven. We simulate a realistic attack campaign and see whether your defences actually catch it. So a pentest tells you where your weak spots are, while a red team engagement tells you whether your blue team can spot an attack in progress.

Yes, and most of our assessments are exactly that. We need access credentials, documentation, and written authorisation from you. We don't need to have built the system to find the holes in it.

With a retainer, we make initial contact in under an hour, any time of day. Without one, we aim to be engaged within four hours. If you have an active incident right now, message us on WhatsApp.

A full written report, not a raw scan dump. It includes an executive summary written in plain business-risk language, CVSS-scored findings with evidence, steps to reproduce each one, and guidance on how to fix them. We also include a re-test window once you've worked through the fixes.

Yes. We test the entire AI surface against the OWASP LLM Top 10: prompt injection (direct and indirect), jailbreaks, training-data leakage, model denial of service, supply-chain risks on model weights and embeddings, sensitive-information disclosure through RAG, insecure plugin and tool-use design, and agentic systems with too much autonomy. The report covers the model, the prompts, the retrieval layer, the tools the agent can call, and the data it can reach.

We deploy SIEM with machine-learning anomaly detection so behavioural baselines pick up the slow, quiet attacks that signature rules miss. On top of that we wire in LLM-powered alert triage: each alert is summarised in plain language, ranked by likely severity, and grouped with related events, which typically cuts triage volume by 60 to 80%. The aim is to reduce noise so the analysts spend their time on real incidents, not on dismissing false positives.

We define scope together during the planning phase, before any testing begins. You tell us which assets are in play (domains, IP ranges, applications, APIs, mobile apps, cloud accounts), and which are explicitly off-limits. We write the agreed targets, rules of engagement, and testing windows into a signed document, so nothing gets touched outside that boundary and there are no surprises.

For most assessments we recommend grey-box: you give us test accounts at each privilege level, network access, and relevant documentation or source code, which makes the test faster and more thorough. You get deeper coverage for the same budget, since we are not spending days on reconnaissance that a determined attacker would eventually complete anyway. A black-box test, by contrast, starts with no inside knowledge at all. We recommend the level that fits your risk and budget.

Every finding is scored with CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) and mapped to a plain-language band: critical, high, medium, low, or informational. The rating reflects both technical impact and how exploitable the issue is in your specific context, not just a raw number. That lets you prioritise remediation by real business risk rather than guessing which findings actually matter.

Yes. Every engagement includes a retest window once you have worked through the fixes, usually within 30 to 60 days of the original report. We re-run the same tests against each remediated finding and confirm whether it is genuinely closed or only partially mitigated. You receive an updated report showing the resolved status of each item, which is often what auditors and customers want to see.

Yes. We align our testing and reporting to the framework you need, whether that is ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, or Indonesian regulations such as OJK and the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP). The report is structured so your auditor can map findings directly to the relevant controls. If you are pursuing certification, we can scope the assessment to satisfy the penetration testing and vulnerability management requirements those standards impose.

Our default is to test without disrupting your operations. Wherever possible we work against a staging or pre-production environment that mirrors production, and we agree testing windows in advance for anything live. Intrusive checks such as denial-of-service or load testing are only run with your explicit written sign-off, and we keep a direct contact open during testing so anything unexpected can be paused immediately.