Logs exist, but nobody is reading them
When an incident hits, the team realises they can't piece together what happened. Forensics after the fact go nowhere if the logs were never collected in one place.
A red team finds the holes. A blue team watches for anyone trying to use them. Your environment gets a SIEM with machine-learning anomaly detection, LLM-powered alert triage that summarises incidents in plain language, and detection rules tuned to how you actually run. Then your team is trained to act on the alerts that matter instead of drowning in false positives.
Open-source and commercial tooling your team can keep running on its own.
On average, more than 200 days pass between a breach and the moment someone notices it. By then the attacker has moved across your network, taken data, and set up ways to get back in. A blue team exists to shrink that gap from months down to hours.
When an incident hits, the team realises they can't piece together what happened. Forensics after the fact go nowhere if the logs were never collected in one place.
There are 300 alerts a day and 290 of them are false positives. So the team stopped reading them. The 10 alerts that mattered never got investigated.
There is a security policy somewhere. When a real incident happens, nobody follows it, because it doesn't match the situation in front of them and they never practiced it.
Application logs sit in CloudWatch, network logs sit in the firewall, host logs sit on the servers. Tracing a single lateral movement event means clicking through three different interfaces by hand. Attackers count on exactly that.
Each step produces something concrete, comes with a written hand-off, and has to pass a checkpoint before we move on to the next one.
We design how your logs get collected: what to capture, where it comes from, how long to keep it, and what that costs. The build uses Fluentd or Fluent Bit collectors, structured logging standards, and a pipeline that holds up when traffic spikes instead of quietly dropping events.
We deploy and configure Elastic SIEM, Wazuh, or a cloud-native equivalent. It comes with dashboards, saved searches, and correlation rules tuned to your environment rather than a generic template someone copied from a vendor.
We write rules for the attack surface you actually have. That covers failed authentication patterns, signs of lateral movement, data exfiltration, and privilege escalation attempts. Each rule is tuned so it doesn't drown your team in false positives.
We connect open-source or commercial threat intelligence feeds for IOC matching, so known bad IPs, domains, and file hashes get flagged automatically as they show up in your logs.
We write detection playbooks for your top 10 alert types, covering what to check, what to escalate, and what to do next. Before we hand off, we run tabletop exercises so you know the playbooks hold up.
These are outcomes you can measure, not a slide deck. Here's the change you should expect to see.
Application, network, and host logs are correlated inside a single SIEM. When something happens, the whole picture is right there instead of spread across three tools.
Detection rules tuned to your environment keep alert volume low and confidence high, so your team can read every alert that comes in.
Your team runs tabletop exercises before the engagement ends, so the response is already practiced well before the real incident arrives.
Log retention and correlation rules are set up so that after an incident you can reconstruct exactly what happened and back it up with evidence.
We do both. In a standard engagement we deploy the tooling, tune the detection rules, and train your team to run it. If you don't have an internal team to operate the SOC, we offer a managed detection and response retainer with agreed escalation SLAs.
We tune against a baseline. Before writing any detection rules, we spend time learning what normal looks like in your environment. Rules run in observation mode first, with exclusion logic suppressing the noise, and only start alerting once the signal-to-noise ratio is good enough.
We use open-source feeds such as AlienVault OTX, Emerging Threats, and abuse.ch as a baseline, and add commercial feeds for clients with a more mature program. The choice depends on your threat model, since a fintech company faces a very different set of adversaries than an e-commerce startup.
We typically deploy Elastic SIEM or Wazuh, or work with a cloud-native option like Microsoft Sentinel if that fits your stack better. The choice depends on your existing logging, your budget, and whether your team needs to keep running it independently afterwards. We deploy something your team can actually operate, not a tool that becomes shelfware.
We map rules to the attack surface you actually have and to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, covering failed authentication patterns, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and privilege escalation. Each rule is built against a baseline of your normal activity so it fires on genuine anomalies. We document what each rule detects and what to do when it triggers.
We learn what normal looks like in your environment first, then run new rules in observation mode with exclusion logic suppressing the known-good noise. Rules only start alerting once the signal-to-noise ratio is good enough, and LLM-assisted triage summarises and prioritises what remains. The target is fewer than ten false positives a day so every alert is worth reading.
In a standard engagement we set up the tooling and train your team to run the monitoring themselves. If you do not have the staff to cover it, we offer a managed detection and response retainer with agreed escalation SLAs and after-hours coverage. We will help you decide which model fits your team size and risk profile.
Ideally centralised logging from your applications, network, and hosts, or at least access to those log sources so we can build the pipeline. We also need to understand your environment: assets, user roles, and what normal traffic looks like. If logging is fragmented or missing, building that foundation is the first part of the engagement.
Yes. Before we hand off, we run tabletop exercises that walk your team through realistic scenarios using the detection playbooks we wrote. It tests whether the runbooks hold up and whether people know what to check, escalate, and do next. The response is practised well before a real incident arrives.
The SIEM, detection rules, and log retention we set up are exactly what an incident responder needs to reconstruct an attack, so the blue team work feeds directly into faster forensics. The detection playbooks define when an alert becomes an incident and who to escalate to. If you also hold an incident response retainer with us, the team responding already knows your environment.
Dealing with an active incident? Message us on WhatsApp now. For anything else, whether that's a security assessment, DevSecOps work, or a blue team setup, the form below is the place to start. We reply within one working day with a straight read on scope and cost.
Office
Surabaya, Indonesia
Starting price
From USD 4,000
Typical projects: USD 4,000–25,000